Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bandy-Freeman v. City of Tarrant, Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv01148
Plaintiff:
Veronica Bandy-Freeman
Defendant:
City of Tarrant, Alabama, Wayman A Newton and John Tommy Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cloyd v. The Town of Newton, Alabama (CONSENT)
as 1:2021cv00643
Plaintiff:
RaeMonica Cloyd
Defendant:
The Town of Newton, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311
Prosser et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Prosser, Brooke Prosser, Fred Rush and others
Defendant:
B. T. Roberts, Clark Sahlie, James W. Rane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Lauhoff v. Lawrence County, Alabama et al
as 5:2014cv00614
Plaintiff:
Aubry Lauhoff
Defendant:
Lawrence County, Alabama , Gene Mitchell , James Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton, et al v. State of Alabama, et al(PANEL)(MEMBER)
as 2:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Newton , Alabama Democratic Conference , Framon Weaver, Sr. and others
Defendant:
State of Alabama , Robert J. Bentley and Beth Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Smith v. Auburn University, et al (MAG+)
as 2:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Defendant:
Auburn University, The Auburn University Board of Trustees, Raymond J. Harbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
