Civil Rights Cases
John Evans Arek v. City of Fullerton et al
as 8:2023cv02022
Plaintiff: John Evans Arek
Defendant: City of Fullerton, Officer Kalscheuer Matthew, Officer Kenton Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Redal v. Merritt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05782
Plaintiff: Mr. Joseph T. Redal and Joseph T Redal
Defendant: Officer Adam Merritt, Officer #447, Officer Peterson #459 and others
Defendant / Appellant: Chief of Police Tom Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sprayberry v. Officer Peterson et al.
as 3:2013cv50135
Plaintiff: James Randal Sprayberry
Defendant: City Of South Beloit, Officer Hruska and Officer Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cannon v. City Of Wilmington et al
as 1:2012cv01360
Plaintiff: Raheem T. Cannon
Defendant: City Of Wilmington, Officer Evans, Detective Gary Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alston v. City of Sacramento, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02079
Plaintiff: CD Alston
Defendant: City of Sacramento, Sacramento City Police Department, Rick Braziel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Theodore Kind v. NW Metro Drug Task Force, et al
as 11-1901
Plaintiff - Appellant: Darrell Theodore Kind
Defendant - Appellee: Northwest Metro Drug Task Force, Investigator Derrick Hacker, Sgt. Sigfrinus and others
Movant: Judge Janet N. Poston
Rothunde v. Sigler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01194
Defendant: Wolf Christopher, Mary Sigler, Dorretta O'Brien and others
Plaintiff: Kimberly A. Rothunde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rothunde v. Sigler et al
as 1:2009cv06177
Plaintiff: Kimberly A. Rothunde
Defendant: Mary Sigler, Dorretta O'Brien, Duane Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?