Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dietzschold et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Dica Dietzschold and Grace Dietzschold
Defendant:
City of Portland, Jeffrey P. Dorn, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Multnomah County Sheriff et al
as 3:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Edward Bailey
Defendant:
Multnomah County Sheriff, Michael Reese, CPT. Eric P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Bean v. Oregon State Bar
as 3:2021cv01619
Plaintiff:
Terrence P. Bean
Defendant:
Oregon State Bar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacoe v. Douglas County Sheriffs' Office et al
as 6:2021cv01611
Plaintiff:
Christopher W Lacoe and Christopher W. Lacoe
Defendant:
Douglas County Douglas County Sheriff's Department, Deputy Justin C Hood, Deputy Ryan T Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. State of Oregon Perole Office et al
as 6:2021cv01608
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Acosta
Defendant:
State of Oregon Perole Office, Susan Otoole, Trevor Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Oseguera v. Oller et al
as 1:2021cv01410
Plaintiff:
Javier Oseguera
Defendant:
Sergeant Quint P Oller, Officer Jonathan C Adamson, Officer Kevin E Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv01343
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Acosta
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Thomas O. Branford, Marria Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaser v. Weiss
as 6:2021cv00403
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lee Blaser
Defendant:
William P. Weiss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
