Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Searcy v. Progressive Insurance
as 3:2022cv02803
Plaintiff:
Candace Searcy
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Santoyo et al
as 3:2022cv01911
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones
Defendant:
Guillermo Santoyo, Jr, Joel Gonzalez, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Pruitt v. Warren et al
as 3:2022cv01325
Plaintiff:
Deborah A Pruitt
Defendant:
John F Warren, Melissa Jean Bellan, Dorothy Jean Mulichy Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruitt v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2020cv01899
Defendant:
Todd Allen, Judge D'Metria Benson, Washington Law Firm and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah A Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Progressive Environmental Services, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00897
Defendant:
Progressive Environmental Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alfred Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jefferson et al v. Collins et al
as 5:2018cv00092
Defendant:
Texas Bowie County, Unknown Parties, Progressive Insurance and others
Plaintiff:
Demetra Wysinger, Rosie Jefferson and Roselyn Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
