Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barry et al v. Newaygo, County of, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
William Barry, Mark Booher, Tom Burkholder and others
Defendant:
Heemstra Enterprises, LLC, Newaygo, County of, Jason O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 American Disability Act
Trapp v. City of Warren et al
as 5:2021cv10120
Defendant:
City of Warren, Officer Doe, Officer Baggiano and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Andrew Trapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bally et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv01088
Defendant:
Mary Hall-Thiam, Jeannette Bradshaw, Jonathan Kinloch and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Hatch, Steven Butler, Lena Bally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. PALMER et al
as 2:2020cv11841
Defendant:
CHRISTIE PALMER, Michigan State Police and County of Jackson
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GLENN ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCann v. Fuller et al
as 1:2019cv01032
Defendant:
Bryan Fuller, Michael Criger, Lonnie Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E McCann and Raymond E. McCann, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Human Rights Defense Center v. Winn et al
as 1:2019cv12470
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Defendant:
Willie Smith, O'Bell Winn, Bonita Hoffner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Simmons v. Swafford et al
as 2:2019cv11595
Defendant:
Danielle Shamus, John Doe, Kim Worthy and others
Plaintiff:
Latausha Simmons
Palmer v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2018cv11519
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Palmer
Defendant:
Dasumo Mitchell, Deborah Price, River Rouge Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
