Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Paul Clement Johnsen et al
as 2:2024cv02456
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members and James Lee
Defendant:
PAUL CLEMENT JOHNSEN, TRUSTEE, WENDY MICHELLE JOHNSEN, TRUSTEE and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
MIERZWA v. ASHCROFT et al
as 2:2017cv02625
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. MIERZWA
Defendant:
JOHN ASHCROFT, ALBERTO GONZALEZ, PAUL CLEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEUMAN v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2008cv01068
Plaintiff:
JAMES NEUMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF COORDINATION AND REVIEW FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Consol Defendant:
CONDOLEEZZA RICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hasan v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv06683
Plaintiff:
Husam A. Hasan
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Paul Clement, Emilio T Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Treece v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner et al
as 2:2007cv02028
Plaintiff:
Charles A Treece
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner and Paul Clement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Brown v. Fitzgerald et al
as 1:2007cv05225
Plaintiff:
Eugene W. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick J Fitzgerald, Thomas P Walsh, Paul Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Nowak v. Clement
as 1:2007cv04939
Petitioner:
Benedykt Nowak
Respondent:
Paul Clement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Luu v. Clement et al
as 5:2007cv04493
Plaintiff:
Bao Chris Tu Luu
Defendant:
Paul Clement, Michael Chertoff, David N. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
