Cases 1 - 10 of 13
John Doe v. Purdue University, et al
as 23-2764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
PURDUE UNIVERSITY, PURDUE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, MITCHELL ELIAS DANIELS, JR., iin his official capacity as President of Purdue University and others
Doe v. Roe, et. al.
as 4:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Alyssa Rollock, Dawn Gross, Katherine Sermersheim and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
John Doe v. Purdue University, et al
as 17-3565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
PURDUE UNIVERSITY, PURDUE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, MITCHELL ELIAS DANIELS, JR., individually and as agent for Purdue University and others
Doe v. Purdue University et al
as 2:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Purdue University , Purdue University Board of Trustees , Mitchell Elias Daniels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Falk v. Purdue University Board of Trustees of et al
as 2:2013cv00159
Plaintiff:
Gideon Falk
Defendant:
Purdue University Board of Trustees of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SRIVASTAVA v. HAMILTON et al
as 1:2013cv00134
Defendant:
AARON-RUBEN-NELSON MORTUARY, MARY MORIARTY ADAMS, AFNI, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN H. SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SRIVASTAVA v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2012cv01309
Defendant:
JOHN BARTHOLOMEW, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
