Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Randall v. Claycosky et al
as 1:2024cv01360
Plaintiff:
Ryan Randall
Defendant:
E. Claycosky, E. Wong, Owner of Dimensions Shop and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sewell v. Engel et al
as 8:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Edward Sewell
Defendant:
Jason R. Engel, Esq., Don Douglas, Britainy Mafra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hill et al v. Hunt et al
as 1:2020cv03746
Plaintiff:
Nichoel Hill and William Hill
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Human Services, Maryland Child Protective Services, Baltimore County Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis et al v. Martin et al
as 1:2015cv01746
Plaintiff:
David Davis and Maribeth Donohue
Defendant:
Randall Martin , Theresa Martin , Lifeline, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe et al v. Salisbury University et al
as 1:2015cv00517
Defendant:
Salisbury University, Valerie Randall-Lee, Helena Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Doe, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
