Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rehn v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Elisabeth Rehn
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Riley Caufield, Younghun Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nair et al v. Toth et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Defendant:
John Doe, Alex Toth, Paul Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Jayakumar Sundaran Nair, Rajakumari Susheelkumar, Jayakrishnan Krishnan Nair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Webb v. Enterprise Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2022cv05406
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores Inc, Enterprise Holdings LLC, Jessica Rivera Sink and others
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Busey et al
as 3:2022cv05030
Defendant:
KeyBank, Kohl's Department Store, Kelly Busey and others
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley et al v. Spokane Valley, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00355
Plaintiff:
Joseph Riley and Shalee Riley
Defendant:
Spokane Valley, City of, Larry Haskell, Sharon Hedlund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cranford v. Spokane County et al
as 2:2021cv00099
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, State of Washington, CO Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn D Cranford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv06193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Perrine v. City of Kennewick et al
as 4:2017cv05007
Plaintiff:
Michael Perrine
Defendant:
City of Kennewick , Cindy Blackmore , Joshua Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
