Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Martin v. Walls et al
as 1:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
Linda G Martin
Defendant:
Charles M. Walls , The Estate of John B. Mills, Sr , Robert Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Walls et al
as 4:2013cv00558
Plaintiff:
Linda G. Martin
Defendant:
Charles M. Walls, The Estate of John B. Mills, Sr, Robert Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Harper v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 08-3413
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT HARPER
Defendant - Appellant:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and SHERIFF OF COOK COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Harper v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv02197
Plaintiff:
Robert Harper
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, D. Patterson, Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harper v. Sheriff of Cook County et al
as 1:2007cv02393
Plaintiff:
Robert Harper
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cook County and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 06-6308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Real Party In Interest - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 06-6235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
