Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brikho v. Nolen et al
as 2:2018cv12965
Defendant:
City of Inkster, Byron Nolen, Connie Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
George Brikho, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holistic Health Inkster, Inc et al v. Inkster, City of et al
as 5:2018cv12895
Defendant:
Felicia Rutledge, Byron Nolen and Inkster, City of
Plaintiff:
Samantha Bevins, Holistic Hwealth Inkster Inc and Holistic Health Inkster, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chambers v. Rutledge et al
as 1:2017cv00539
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Chambers
Defendant:
Rebecca Rutledge and Douglas Doornbos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Williams v. Vancamp
as 4:2017cv10637
Plaintiff:
Otis Williams, III, Audrey Arthur, Lawson Love and others
Defendant:
John Vancamp, Timothy Thorland, Richard S. Zeiman and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Sharon Brooks, Tiffani Donald, Mia Tate and others
Caspar et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2014cv11499
Plaintiff:
Marsha Caspar , Glenna DeJong , Clint McCormack and others
Defendant:
Rick Snyder , Maura Corrigan , Phil Stoddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv12470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Pace et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2011cv12888
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , Tharadrous White , Jeb Rutledge and others
Plaintiff:
Mychal Pace , Bryton Pace and Chante' Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2009cv12911
Plaintiff:
Kevin White
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Tommy Billings, Jeb Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Type:
Civil Rights
Silver v. Giles et al
as 1:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
Stephen Silver
Defendant:
Mark Giles, Mark Lytle, Richard Rosenberg and others
Counter-claimant:
Gail Rutledge
Counter-defendant:
Stephen Silver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
