Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WALKER v. NOWASKOWSKI et al
as 1:2021cv02291
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. WALKER
Defendant:
RICHARD R. NOWASKOWSKI, MARK R. STETZEL, JENNIFER K. BARTEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REESE v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2016cv01925
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and VINCENT MARSHALL
Plaintiff:
DARREN REESE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CARLOCK et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2013cv01032
Defendant:
RYAN ASHER, PAUL CIESIELSKI, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. CARLOCK and PATRIC MCDOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THE ESTATE OF CHARLES REPASS, JR v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2007cv01615
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CHARLES REPASS, JR
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NEIL PROPST, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
