Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Keliihuluhulu: v. Keanaaina et al
as 1:2019cv00417
Defendant:
Jean Keka, Richard Ramirez, Master Falau and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Leitu Ramirez, Felise Auaea, Julia Kamanawa-Kala and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Spinney Keliihuluhulu:
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Wade Robertson v. Richard Honn, et al
as 18-16304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. HONN, CATHERINE D. PURCELL, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN and others
Wade Robertson v. Richard Honn, et al
as 18-15933
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. HONN, CATHERINE D. PURCELL, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN and others
Robertson v. Honn et al
as 3:2017cv01724
Plaintiff:
Wade Anthony Robertson
Defendant:
Richard A. Honn, Catherine D. Purcell, Judith A. Epstein and others
Miscellaneou:
Ty Clevenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04174
Plaintiff:
Richard Ramirez
Defendant:
City Of New York, Dwight Powell, James Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Microsoft et al
as 3:2015cv01753
Plaintiff:
Richard Ramirez
Defendant:
Microsoft, Apple, Viacom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv10170
Plaintiff:
Richard Ramirez
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Dariel Firpo, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camejo v. New York City et al
as 1:2012cv02370
Plaintiff:
Andy Camejo
Defendant:
Police Officer John Doe, New York City and Police Officer Richard Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Kleinhammer v. City of Paso Robles, et al
as 09-55296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD WILLIAM KLEINHAMMER, pro se
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PASO ROBLES, TEMPLETON COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, BILL MILLER, District Ex-Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
