Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5807
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Woodhead v. Zakary Ridener, et al
as 22-5533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WOODHEAD
Defendant / Appellee:
ZAKARY RIDENER, Lexington, KY Police Officer, Individually and KEITH MCKINNEY, Lexington, KY Police Officer, Individually
Hutchison v. Riden et al
as 3:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Joseph Don Hutchison
Defendant:
Michael Riden, John McPeek and City of Harrisburg IL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodhead v. Ridener et al
as 5:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
James Woodhead
Defendant:
Zakary Ridener and Keith McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIDENER et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 4:2021cv00074
Defendant:
KELSEY SMITHA, TERRY STIGDON, MICHELLE RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
LISA MAUREEN RIDENER and DARWIN RIDENER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv09354
Defendant:
NYPD Detective Christopher Fowler, NYPD Officer Hansen, NYPD John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv09151
Defendant:
NYPD Detective Nicholas Mason, NYPD Detective Raymond Gerola, Lawrence Byrne, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv08540
Defendant:
NYPD Officer John Doe 3, Detective Nicholas Mason, NYPD Officer John Doe 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Towaki M. Komatsu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
