Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Titus et al
as 3:2019cv00369
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rodgers
Defendant:
Joshua Titus, Barnes and Elkhart Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sebenste et al v. Indiana Department of Child Services et al
as 2:2018cv00269
Defendant:
Director Rebecca Gromala, Family Case Manager Natasha Walters, Indiana Department of Child Services and others
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Sebenste and April Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODGERS v. APPLIED COMPOSITE ENGINEERING, INC.
as 1:2018cv01115
Defendant:
APPLIED COMPOSITES ENGINEERING, INC.
Plaintiff:
GLORIA RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Briscoe v. City of Elkhart et al
as 3:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Steven Briscoe
Defendant:
Elkhart City of , Ed Windbigler , Officer D. Mayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Birnbaum v. Rogers et al
as 3:2014cv01957
Plaintiff:
Rodger Birnbaum
Defendant:
Fred Rogers, Barney Rausch, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01570
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
