Cases 1 - 10 of 381
Whitfield v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04667
Plaintiff:
Corris A Whitfield
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer John J. Salinas, Anthony Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rojas v. City of Gilroy et al
as 5:2024cv03206
Plaintiff:
Joe Rojas
Defendant:
City Of Gilroy, Michael McMahon, Officer Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rojas et al v. Solari Enterprises
as 5:2024cv01959
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Rojas and Taneisha Merritt-Rojas
Defendant:
Solari Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramon Alvarez v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarez
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Police Department, The County of Orange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Gary Blackwell et al v. City of Beaumont et al
as 5:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Gary Blackwell and Shannon Luellen
Defendant:
City of Beaumont, Officer Anthony Becerra, Officer Fabian Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Rojas Martinez et al v. Clake LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Orquidea Rojas Martinez and Ricardo Ruiz
Defendant:
Clake LLC and Eddi Matti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Lazaro Rojas v. City of El Monte et al
as 2:2024cv01836
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Rojas
Defendant:
City of El Monte, Detective Carlos Molina and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
