Civil Rights Cases filed in North Carolina
RAGGIO v. DAVIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff: TARAS N. RAGGIO
Defendant: SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Nackab v. Butler, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00587
Plaintiff: John Thomas Nackab
Defendant: Earl R. Butler, Tim Britt, C.L. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEMORY et al v. COUNTY OF COLUMBUS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2010cv00064
Plaintiff: Angel Memory, MELVIN CAMPBELL, DOLROE HAMER and others
Defendant: COUNTY OF COLUMBUS , Columbus County , CHADBOURN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABU DAMES v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00304
Plaintiff: ASHRAF MAHMOUD ABU DAMES
Defendant: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALES, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Adams v. Coffey et al
as 7:2007cv00060
Plaintiff: Michael S Adams
Defendant: M. Terry Coffey, Jeff D. Etheridge, Jr., Charles D. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2007cv00064
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Adams v. Coffey et al
as 7:2007cv00063
Plaintiff: Michael S Adams
Defendant: M. Terry Coffey, Jeff D. Etheridge, Jr., Charles D. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Adams v. Coffey et al
as 7:2007cv00059
Plaintiff: Michael S Adams
Defendant: M. Terry Coffey, Jeff D Etheridge, Charles D. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?