Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-36010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reevis v. Spokane Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00069
Petitioner:
Charles Joseph Reeves V
Defendant:
Spokane Police Department and Sacred Heart Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucero v. Peace Health Medical Group et al
as 3:2018cv01719
Plaintiff:
Chloe Anneliese Lucero
Defendant:
John Doe, Peace Health Medical Group and Peace Health Sacred Heart Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lucero v. Peace Health Medical Group et al
as 2:2018cv00859
Plaintiff:
Chloe Anneliese Lucero
Defendant:
John Doe, Peace Health Medical Group and Peace Health Sacred Heart Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-35548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Larry Hardy v. Mental Health, et al
as 08-35873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY J. HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
MENTAL HEALTH, SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PROGRAMS, (SNAP), SPOKANE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
