Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BLAKELY v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Larry Gray Blakley, Sr.
Defendant:
WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, SERGEANT Joshua Mabe, Deputy Cody Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Smith v Polk County, et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Wayne Smith and Wayne K. Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Polk County, Timothy Wright, Timothy L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Poole v. Hawkins
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dallas C. Poole, Sr.
Defendant:
Carey Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ABRAHAM v. MCDOUGAL, et al.
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ABRAHAM, SR.
Defendant:
TRAVIS MCDOUGAL, THOMAS ZOPODVA, C. A. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BEY v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
ABJUL BEY and JAGUAR SUN OF BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION
Defendant:
JUDGE BRADLEY R. ALLEN, SR., GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAW RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
