Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Folse v. City of Huntington et al
as 3:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
City of Huntington, Scott Damron, John Doe Code Enforcement Officers 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hood et al v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hood and Mary Hood
Defendant:
The West Viriginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Christina Farmer, Jannette Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Folse v. McCuskey, et al
as 2:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
John McCuskey, Jr., G. Russell Rollyson, Jr., Wallace Looney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Upton et al
as 1:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Caren Jenkins
Defendant:
Stephen Upton and Crystal Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Oiler et al
as 3:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
Chad Smith
Defendant:
Brandon Oiler, William M. Mullins, Stephen Lusher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swiger v. West Liberty University et al
as 5:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Dawn Swiger
Defendant:
West Liberty University, Stephen Griener, Brian Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00530
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
