Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WARNER v. SCOTLAND COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DAVID WARNER
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING v. SCOTLAND COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR et al
as 1:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
ROY KING
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR and TAX ASSESSMENT OFFICE OF SCOTLAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARNER v. SCOTLAND COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY DAVID WARNER
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cassara et al v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Scotland Memorial Hospital, Inc., The Law Offices of William R. Purcell, William Purcell and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce Riggin and Helen Cassara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Freeman v. Turner et al
as 4:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Gladys M Freeman
Defendant:
John P Turner and Town of Scotland Neck, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EL BEY v. SCOTLAND COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al
as 1:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
AMIR EL BEY
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL BEY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2011cv00051
Plaintiff:
AMIR EL BEY
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, SCOTLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL A. NOBLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00814
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
