Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Fogg v. U.S.A. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) et al
as 5:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Fogg
Defendant:
U.S.A. Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Division of Department of Homeland Security, Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Harris v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Katherine Harris
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMARY v. SOLES et al
as 1:2009cv00781
Plaintiff:
DYRON D. HAMMARY
Defendant:
JERRY WAYNE SOLES, JR., M. POTTER, KEVIN WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SHEPHERD v. GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY
as 1:2008cv00750
Plaintiff:
A. T. SHEPHERD
Defendant:
GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FENNER v. BELL
as 1:2008cv00367
Plaintiff:
WALDO FENNER
Defendant:
BILL BELL, PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
