Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Avery v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Carlton L. Avery
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2024cv01273
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff, James Love, E. French Judicial Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Roberta Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Alabama et al
as 6:2024cv01262
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Walker County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Luke Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00314
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nelson v. Eller et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Stanley Wilson and Deputy Sheriff Eller
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raley v. Pitts et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L. Raley
Defendant:
Mike Cheshire, Clay Conway, Jonathan Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Reece et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Tyrone Smith and Lt. Deputy Tracey Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baggett v. Officer Joshua Washburn et al
as 2:2024cv00643
Defendant:
Officer Joshua Washburn, Deputy Sheriff J.L. Chestnut, Bessemer, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Sherry Baggett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Pettway
as 2:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Betty Henderson
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Pettway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clemons v. Mobile County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Chafarrah Clemons
Defendant:
Mobile County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
