Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
INGRAM v. T-ONE LLC
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
MARCUS INGRAM
Defendant:
T-ONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 1:2023cv16751
Plaintiff:
Justice Jackson
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Portillo v. Richardson et al
as 1:2023cv10237
Plaintiff:
Minerva Portillo
Defendant:
Terry Richardson, Trump Model Management LLC, T-Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
T's Wireless, LLC et al v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2023cv01444
Plaintiff:
T's Wireless, LLC and Tarek Shehadeh
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, Jake Dishaw and Ben Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 American Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
