Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6078
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
VanBuskirk, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6079
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6080
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Palms v. Texas Children's Hospital
as 24-20174
Plaintiff:
Tisha Palms
Defendant:
Texas Children's Hospital, Incorporated
Vanbuskirk v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6070
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6069
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6049
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Paula Carrie Rogers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Bobby Davis, Tina Durham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
