Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Higley v. State of Utah, et al
as 23-4033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK LEE HIGLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, SPENCER COX, Governor, TOOELE COUNTY and others
Yarbrough v. Tooele County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Aaron A. Yarborough
Defendant:
Tooele County Detention Center, David Nuffer, United States Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Higley v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Higley
Defendant:
State of Utah, Spencer Cox, Tooele County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yarbrough v. Tooele County Detention Center et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Mr. Aaron A Yarbrough, Sr. and Aaron A. Yarborough
Defendant:
Tooele County Detention Center, Hon. David Nuffer, Attorney Vernon Stejskal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00797
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Bain v. Bain et al
as 1:2019cv09566
Plaintiff:
Nikole Ann Bain and Minor Child B.A.B.
Defendant:
Blanding Police Department, Cache County, Darin Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Romero v. Tooele County et al
as 2:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Brad Young, Wilbert Tso, Tooele County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Dalton Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Butler v. Tooele County School District et al
as 2:2016cv00552
Plaintiff:
Belinda Butler
Defendant:
Tooele County School District and Scott Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
