Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jane Sullivan, et al v. University of Washington, et al
as 23-35313
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE SULLIVAN and P. POES, 1-75; Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings, University of Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CALIFORNIANS AWARE, FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Project Vote v. Elisa Long
as 11-1809
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PROJECT VOTE/VOTING FOR AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellant:
ELISA LONG, in her official capacity as General Registrar of Norfolk, Virginia and DONALD PALMER, in his official capacity as Secretary, State Board of Elections
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEWS EDITORS and others
Walters et al v. Seattle School District No 1 et al
as 2:2009cv00117
Plaintiff:
Amos Walters and Laura Fuller
Defendant:
Seattle School District No 1 and Seattle Times
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walters et al v. Seattle School District No 1 et al
as 2:2008cv00264
Plaintiff:
Amos Walters and Laura Fuller
Defendant:
Seattle School District No 1, Seattle Times, Glenn Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
