Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Jett v. U.S. Post Office et al
as 3:2024cv01472
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Jett
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office, U.S. Workers Compensation, U.S. ECAB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dierlam v. Biden
as 23-20401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John J. Dierlam
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Linda Chase v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 23-12015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA CHASE
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
YISREAL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 1:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
SHIFRAH YOCHEVED YISREAL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
