Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hayden v. Vance, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00469
Plaintiff:
Steven Mark Hayden
Defendant:
Robert S. Vance, Jr. , Anne-Marie Adams , J. Scott Vowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ahmed-Al-Khalifa v. National Security Agency, United States et al
as 2:2013cv01961
Plaintiff:
Oluwashina Kazeem Ahmed-Al-Khalifa
Defendant:
National Security Agency, United States, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States, Department of Homeland Security, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dillard v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2012cv03875
Plaintiff:
Tamuriel L. Dillard
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigtion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 2:2011cv03811
Plaintiff:
Tami Todd
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jackson v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2009cv00446
Plaintiff:
Myron J. Jackson
Defendant:
State of Alabama, City of Montgomery, Brewbaker Motors Dodge Chrysler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jackson v. City of Montgomery, AL et al
as 2:2009cv00447
Plaintiff:
Myron J. Jackson
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, AL, State of AL, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. EEOC et al
as 2:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Myron J. Jackson
Defendant:
EEOC, City of Montgomery Fire Dept, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. EEOC et al
as 2:2009cv00444
Plaintiff:
Myron J. Jackson
Defendant:
EEOC, Richard Ebbinghouse, City of Montgomery, AL Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
