Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Weemes v. City of Morristown, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Michelle Weemes and Jimmy Weemes
Defendant:
City of Morristown, Tennessee, Walmart Stores East, L.P., Walmart Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ledford v. Hensley et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Randall Eugene Ledford
Defendant:
Mike Hensley, Walmart Unicoi, Aaron Embler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Quinn, Jr v. Walmart et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Quinn, Jr
Defendant:
Walmart and Hilary Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Meyer et al v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee et al (TV1)
as 1:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Timothy Meyer, Melissa Meyer, Timothy W. Meyer and others
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, Zachary Lloyd, Luke Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02347
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00533
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
