Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Scarlata et al v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv08111
Plaintiff:
Carl Scarlata and Jaime Scarlata
Defendant:
Jamie Ryan, Nora Jenkins, Kaitlynn Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Leahy et al
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Patricia Elaine Miller
Defendant:
Kelli Leahy and Samantha Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EPCOR Water Arizona Incorporated et al v. Brady et al
as 3:2020cv08045
Plaintiff:
Chad Gebow and EPCOR Water Arizona Incorporated
Defendant:
Annette Wegmann, Tami Ring, Kathy Bruck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2015cv02556
Plaintiff:
Cleous Hamilton
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of , Brady Bailey , Unknown Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Pinal, County of et al
as 2:2015cv02539
Plaintiff:
Judith M Jones and Manuel Monarrez
Defendant:
Pinal, County of, Maricopa, City of, A Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Navajo, County of et al
as 3:2015cv08110
Plaintiff:
Patrick-James Brady
Defendant:
Navajo, County of , Debra Serna , Michael Espino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 2:2014cv01875
Defendant:
Robert Brady, Jesse Newton, Tony Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Milstead et al
as 2:2013cv01459
Plaintiff:
John Woods
Defendant:
Frank Milstead, Christopher Brady, John Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
