Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Gard v. Little et al
as 4:2024cv04092
Plaintiff:
Rex Gard
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Little and Thomas E. Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Discrimination Against the Disabled
Dunn et al v. Penfield et al
as 5:2023cv05025
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Tronvold v. Wasko et al
as 4:2022cv04182
Plaintiff:
Dallas L. Tronvold
Defendant:
Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke, Thomas Huitema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Breedt et al v. Breedt et al
as 1:2022cv01019
Plaintiff:
Christiaan Theunis Gertse Breedt and JRB
Defendant:
Amy Jo Breedt, Thomas Sannes and Pamela Jean Schulte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Thunder Hawk v. City of Martin et al
as 5:2021cv05077
Plaintiff:
Julie Thunder Hawk
Defendant:
City of Martin, Daniel Dove, Thomas Chester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aga et al v. Meade County et al
as 5:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Aga, Randy Aga, Courtney Ahrendt and others
Defendant:
Meade County, KNAUF KG a German Corporation and United States Gypsum Corporation, (USG Corporation) an Illinois Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Attorney General
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff:
Thomas Phillip Bell
Defendant:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
