Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YANANTA v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv03928
Plaintiff:
ISI CHITO LUSA YANANTA, WASTEUH MEHERRIN NATION and HAKEEM SHABAZZ
Defendant:
CHARLES KING, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart bey v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Stewart bey
Defendant:
Kerry L Yates, Fort Wayne City of, Name # 106754 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YATES v. JACKSON COUNTY JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER
as 4:2016cv00048
Defendant:
IDA AUFFENBURG, TONY FLEETWOOD, SUE GANS and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ANTHONY YATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Binstock v. Metropolitan School District of New Durham Township et al
as 3:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Bianca Binstock
Defendant:
Metropolitan School District of New Durham Township , Curtiss Strietelmeier , William Mark Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
