Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Daniel Dydzak v. Midfirst Bank, et al
as 23-16193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDFIRST BANK, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, WILLIAM S. DATO and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. CANBY, MAXINE M. CHESNEY, MOLLY DWYER and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Midfirst Bank, et al
as 23-16122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDFIRST BANK, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, WILLIAM S. DATO and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. CANBY, MAXINE M. CHESNEY, MOLLY DWYER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Baker et al v. Lind et al
as 1:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
David Baker and Elijah Bright
Defendant:
Christopher Lind and David Schofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Dydzak v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 23-15784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant / Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, MIDFIRST BANK, WILLIAM C. CANBY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
