Cases 1 - 10 of 6,963
Alhussein v. Telephone and Cabel Company et al
as 0:2024cv01890
Plaintiff:
Musab Mohamed Alhussein
Defendant:
Telephone and Cabel Company, Cabel and Wireless and AT&T Wireless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Day v. Chauvin et al
as 0:2024cv01862
Plaintiff:
Patricia Dawn Welch Day
Defendant:
Derek Chauvin, Ellen Jensen and Minneapolis, City of, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Public Services Discrimination
Johnson v. Lew et al
as 0:2024cv01858
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel K. Lew, State of Minnesota Sixth Judicial District Public Defender and Center for Changing Lives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of North Branch, Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of North Branch, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Harris v. Metro Transit Police Dept et al
as 0:2024cv01791
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harris
Defendant:
Metro Transit Police Dept, Nelson and Vang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Walz
as 0:2024cv01748
Plaintiff:
American Alliance for Equal Rights
Defendant:
Tim Walz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
