Cases 91 - 100 of 2,370
Johnson v. Livingston
as 1:2017cv00047
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Lee Anthony Johnson
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Bell et al
as 6:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Charles David Brooks
Defendant:
Oliver J Bell, Brad Livingston, Kelvin Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Tustin, Jr. v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-41724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE EDWARD TUSTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, FRANKIE REESCANO and others
Burgess v. Livingston et al
as 4:2016cv03740
Plaintiff:
Lee G. Burgess
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, William Stephens, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez Ortiz v. Livingston et al
as 4:2016cv03749
Plaintiff:
Marcos Lopez Ortiz
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, B.J. Williams and Zeon Zae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horttor v. Livingston et al
as 1:2016cv00214
Plaintiff:
Johnny Horttor
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Bryan Collier, L Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Haufler v. William Stephens, et al
as 16-41640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY HAUFLER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, BRAD LIVINGSTON, ROBERT EASON and others
Hall v. Young et al
as 2:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
George Hall, Jr
Defendant:
Jimmie Young, City of Midland, Texas, County of Midland County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawes v. Stephens et al
as 6:2016cv01313
Plaintiff:
Roger Hawes
Defendant:
William Stephens, Brad Livingston and Pamela Pace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert McClure v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-51353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT TROY MCCLURE
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR BRAD LIVINGSTON, ASSISTANT WARDEN RENE MALDONADO, MAJOR JERRY BELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
