Cases 91 - 100 of 931
Gardiser v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00743
Petitioner:
Jason Warren Gardiser
Respondent:
R. Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARROLL, JR. v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv01720
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DELAWARE COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackgold v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
Suten Blackgold
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Mario Alonzo, D. Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayborne et al v. TRITI et al
as 2:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Jack A Clayborne, Robert D Cartledge, Justin L Williams and others
Defendant:
TRITI, MPJMJ, CNMCM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Joshua Latham
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Connie Gipson, Raymond Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act
Serna v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Alfred David Serna
Defendant:
Madden, Escobar, C. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Slade v. Madden
as 2:2022cv00843
Petitioner:
Barry Slade
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neftali Sanchez v. Raymond Madden
as 22-55410
Petitioner / Appellant:
NEFTALI Z. SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Charles Clements v. Raymond Madden, et al
as 22-55333
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES CRAIG CLEMENTS
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden and A MILLER, Warden
Mynor Varela v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2022cv01864
Petitioner:
Mynor Varela
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
