Cases 91 - 100 of 129
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00080
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eric Johnson v. Raul Lopez, et al
as 11-15077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC E. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RAUL LOPEZ, Warden, T. NORTON, Chief Deputy Warden, N COMAITES, Captain and others
Bishop v. Harrington et al
as 2:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robert Bishop
Defendant:
Kelly Harrington, M.D. Biter, J. Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Harrington et al
as 1:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robert Bishop
Defendant:
Kelly Harrington, M.D. Biter, J. Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Johnson
as 2:2010cv03322
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Mendez
Defendant:
Daniel P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2010cv05494
Plaintiff:
ELWOOD P. JOHNSON
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA, ERIC ECHEVARRIA, JARROD GEISTDORFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2010cv05326
Petitioner:
GREGORY P. JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lopez et al
as 1:2010cv01087
Plaintiff:
Eric Johnson
Defendant:
Raul Lopez, T. Norton, N. Comaites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chancellor Wade v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 10-16271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANCELLOR WADE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOU BLANAS and others
Smith v. First Medical Management et al
as 2:2010cv00215
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X Smith
Defendant:
First Medical Management , Jackquiline Jones , K. Jone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
