Cases 91 - 100 of 743
Bell v. Hinojosa et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bell
Defendant:
Hinojosa, Tanner, Puente and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donaldson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00635
Petitioner:
Eric Wayne Donaldson
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Warden FNU Sanchez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv01913
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Jerry Sanchez, Isaac Kwarteng, Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv01776
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Jerry Sanchez, Isaac Kwarteng, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Banking Department et al
as 5:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
Banking Department, Bexar County Sheriffs, San Antonio Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Sanchez et al
as 9:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lopez
Defendant:
Greg Sanchez, Stacey Fredieu and Nick Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. USA
as 4:2022cv00431
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Ramirez Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Crider v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00498
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Crider
Respondent:
Warden Jerry Sanchez and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2022cv00505
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin and Warden Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Sanchez et al
as 5:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Hector Lopez
Defendant:
Eduardo Sanchez, Javier Salazar and Zahra Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
