Cases 91 - 100 of 30,546
BROWN v. NOYES EDGE et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Defendant:
OFFICER #1 J.P. NOYES EDGE and OFFICER #2 T.H. REECE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Love et al
as 5:2024ct03125
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Skyler Love, Deputy Greene, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Woodard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03126
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Woodard
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden L.B. Kelly, Safety Supervisor Muscle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Deramus v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03127
Plaintiff:
Willie Darnell Deramus
Defendant:
J. Nuna Lee, Sgt. B. Overton, Lt. Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. USA
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Samuel Zuniga Medina
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00425
Petitioner:
RICKY ALLEN WILLIAMS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Pacheco v. Love et al
as 5:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Skyler Love, FNU Greene, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Respondent:
ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SEAN BOONE, MAGGIE BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BRUTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00424
Petitioner:
JARED BRUTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03124
Plaintiff:
Jasper Williams
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
