Cases 91 - 100 of 10,607
Neuhoff v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Colecius Neuhoff
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Hodges
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
John Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosser-Burch v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Teyon Rosser-Burch
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Allen v. South Central Regional Jail
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Daville Devon Allen
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Aramark workers et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Quantel Omek Saunders
Defendant:
Aramark workers, Aramark supervisors, Capt. Hinchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Terry L. Adams
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cornell v. West Virginia Division of Corrections & Rehabilitation
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Dee Anna Cornell
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Allman v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ronald Allman, II
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Tibbs, Correctional Officer Sams and Corr. Officer II Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
