Cases 101 - 110 of 166
Abdullah v. Bethea et al
as 0:2019cv00508
Defendant:
Ofc. Carroway, A/W Sharp, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Rahim Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Dorchester County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv00425
Plaintiff:
Stanley Simmons
Defendant:
Dorchester County Detention Center, Summerville Police Department, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Bryan P. Stirling et al
as 2:2019cv00313
Defendant:
Kennard Dubose, Charles Williams, Tim E. Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lewis Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wardell v. Ace Electronics et al
as 0:2019cv00180
Plaintiff:
Wendel R. Wardell, Jr. and W. Robert Wardell
Defendant:
Charles Hawkins, Andrew Mansukhani, Ace Electronics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Goss v. Stirling et al
as 2:2018cv03245
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Officer John Doe 2, A Gladwell and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. O'Conor et al
as 1:2018cv02723
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Aiken, City of, Leroy Smith and others
Plaintiff:
George A. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kincannon v. Kirkland et al
as 3:2018cv00945
Plaintiff:
J. Todd Kincannon
Defendant:
Eric Kirkland, Nicole Howland, John Does #1-#10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rathbone v. Dollar General et al
as 8:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
Summer D Rathbone
Defendant:
Dollar General , Dolgencorp LLC , John Doe Corporation No 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriquez v. Reid et al
as 4:2017cv03490
Plaintiff:
Julio Rodriquez
Defendant:
Dr. Reid, Jane Doe-1-nurse and Jane Doe-2-medical administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glisson v. Riley et al
as 6:2017cv02599
Plaintiff:
Andrew N Glisson
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Lefford Fate, John McRee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
