Cases 101 - 110 of 1,352
Allah v. Huneycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Rahyim D. Allah
Defendant:
Ronnie L. Huneycutt, Richard D. Bates and Marilyn Gamewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. STATE OF N.C.
as 1:2022cv00973
Petitioner:
JAMES L. MURPHY
Respondent:
STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shannon v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2022ct03391
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Shannon
Defendant:
Mrs. Rodriguez, Dr. Amir Firzoui, Mrs. Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McGriff El v. Bland et al
as 5:2022ct03377
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Judge William Bland, D.A. Matthew L. Delbrige and Larry Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. Kelly
as 5:2022ct03392
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Shannon
Defendant:
Warden Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hopper v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
Gary McFadden, FNU LeBliss, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Kelly v. Brown et al
as 5:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Victor L. O'Kelly
Defendant:
C. Brown, John Doe, I, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordero v. Osceola County Commissioners Board et al
as 5:2022ct03368
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Cordero, II
Defendant:
Osceola County Commissioners Board, John Cooper, Corporal L. Gowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02141
Petitioner:
Christopher L. Brown
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Major McRae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cureton v. Gray et al
as 5:2022ct03329
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton, Jr.
Defendant:
John R. Gray, Mark Flemmings, Monica Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
