Cases 101 - 110 of 240
COOPER v. WARD et al
as 5:2021cv00272
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD COOPER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN TREVONZA BOBBITT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koffler v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
John Robert Koffler
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Ben Ford, Nicholas Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. White et al
as 3:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
Corey D. Thomas
Defendant:
Jermaine White, Jacob Beasley, Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARGREAVES v. WARD et al
as 5:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
CHAD HARGREAVES
Defendant:
GDC COMMISSONER TIMOTHY WARD, GOVERNOR BRIAN KEMP, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolick v. Perry
as 4:2021cv00121
Respondent:
Timothy Ward and Kevin Perry
Petitioner:
Michael J. Bolick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HART v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00120
Defendant:
WARDEN STEADLEY
Respondent:
PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT EDWARDS, LT INGRAM, DEPUTY WARDEN PEOPLES and others
Petitioner:
JONATHAN ANDREW HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2021cv12013
Defendant:
JUDGE PAUL INNES, MICHAEL D. GRILLO, ASSISTANT PROSPECTOR AMANDA NINI and others
Plaintiff:
WENDELL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Chambers et al
as 6:2021cv00036
Defendant:
Stephanie Daniels, Kim Patton-Johnson, Timothy Ward and others
Plaintiff:
William R. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORMIER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2021cv00218
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, WALTER BERRY, PETRILLION WHIPPLE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CORMIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01920
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Timothy Ward and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
