Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 101 - 110 of 30,411
YOUNG v. ACLU et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff: MARION L. YOUNG, I
Defendant: ACLU, KENNETH FAK and GAVIN M. ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff: MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant: GILBERT, GORD, UNIT TEAM MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff: JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00755
Petitioner: OSCAR PEREZ
Respondent: CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AYON v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff: MANUEL GARCIA AYON, JR.
Defendant: FOSTER, AFOLAYAN, BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. ZACTECKY et al
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff: THADDEUS L. RODRIGUEZ, SR.
Defendant: ZACTECKY, LYTKE, MICHELLE STEAL COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLUE v. ELKINS et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff: JEREMY BLUE
Defendant: CRYSTAL ELKINS, MIAIAH J. POTWYN, MARK D. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRNE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00431
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER C. BYRNE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant: JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner: Rickey R Armour
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?