Cases 111 - 120 of 166
Zack v. Unknown BOP Officer 1 et al
as 2:2017cv02552
Plaintiff:
Joshua Zack
Defendant:
Unknown BOP Officer 1, Unknown BOP Officer 2, Unknown BOP Officer 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. North Charleston, City of et al
as 2:2017cv01508
Plaintiff:
Cason O Murray
Defendant:
North Charleston, City of , Ryan Kristofer Terrell , Charleston County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00888
Plaintiff:
Keith B. Porterfield
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bryan P. Stirling , Lefford Fate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Miles et al
as 4:2017cv00708
Plaintiff:
Arnold Parson, Jr
Defendant:
Darren Miles, Buddy Collins, Elista H Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Benjamin et al
as 3:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
Regan T. James
Defendant:
Stephen Benjamin, Daniel Hood, Jeffery Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Ellis et al
as 5:2017cv00500
Plaintiff:
Robert Robinson
Defendant:
Claude Ellis, Benjamin Davis and Sergeant Truesdale (D-1 Shift), et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. B.M.U. Team 3 et al
as 4:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Hugh Harold Russell, III
Defendant:
B.M.U. Team 3, B.M.U. Member #1, F.N.U. L.N.U. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. United States et al
as 5:2016cv03913
Plaintiff:
Burl Washington
Defendant:
United States, Mrs. Cruz, Loranth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickens v. Napolitano et al
as 6:2016cv03606
Plaintiff:
Brian Mickens
Defendant:
Brandon Napolitano, John Doe 1 , John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Abdullah v. Montgomery et al
as 0:2016cv03484
Plaintiff:
Rahim Abdullah
Defendant:
Tammy Montgomery, Kennth Downing, Mickey Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
