Cases 111 - 120 of 664
Hayes v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hayes
Defendant:
IDOC, Jay Christensen, Timothy McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. Akies et al
as 1:2022cv04157
Plaintiff:
Xavier Cato
Defendant:
Randy Akies and Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivey et al v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv04098
Petitioner:
Marcus Ivey and Marvis McDaniel Ivey
Respondent:
Melody Maddox and Sherry Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Petterson et al
as 5:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzales
Defendant:
Mallory Petterson, Benjamin Lodi, Jaime Blaunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Klein et al
as 5:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Louis Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Felix Klein, Scot Say, NFN Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath et al v. Adams et al
as 6:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antonio Heath, Crishaun Heath, Christen Heath and others
Defendant:
Warden Brian Adams, Joseph Barnes, Quan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Satchel v. Maddox
as 5:2022cv00232
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Satchel, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gonzales v. Maddox
as 5:2022cv00233
Petitioner:
Louis Fred Gonzales
Respondent:
Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mansfield v. Morris et al
as 1:2022cv03686
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wesley Mansfield
Defendant:
Lieutenant Morris, Lieutenant Carr, Deputy Stallcup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. United States
as 5:2022cv00225
Petitioner:
Louis Gonzales
Respondent:
United States and Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
