Cases 121 - 130 of 573
Shrieves v. Penna. Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 5:2018cv04254
Petitioner:
James H, Shrieves
Respondent:
PENNA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WESTOVER v. SAAVEDRA et al
as 2:2018cv01321
Defendant:
DR. PETER SAAVEDRA, Superintendent TREVOR WINGARD, JOSEPH SILVA and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA H. WESTOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sanganza v. Joe Doe 1 et al
as 3:2018cv01727
Defendant:
T. Delmonico, Gardner, Marth Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Themba Bernard Sanganza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeWeese v. Shapiro et al
as 1:2018cv01698
Respondent:
Leo L. Dunn, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Josh Shapiro
Petitioner:
H. William DeWeese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. HOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, T. POZIVIAK, M. OPPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Shrieves v. Penna. Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2018cv01683
Petitioner:
James H, Shrieves
Respondent:
Penna. Board of Probation and Parole and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILSON v. ACTING WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2018cv00230
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. WILSON
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NDAULA v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2018cv00137
Respondent:
L. J. ODDO, H. QUAY, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER NDAULA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burgos v. Furguson et al
as 3:2018cv01175
Plaintiff:
David Burgos
Defendant:
Tammy Furguson, Joseph H. Dupont, Szelewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. NAJI et al
as 3:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DR. MUHAMMED NAJI, JANET PEARSON, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
