Cases 131 - 140 of 167
Bair v. Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution et al
as 2:2009cv01730
Petitioner:
Clifford Bair
Respondent:
Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution and Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitmore v. Ives
as 2:2009cv01526
Petitioner:
Thomas Clifford Whitmore
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01159
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bolden v. Ayers
as 3:2009cv02365
Petitioner:
Clifford Stanley Bolden
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Clifford Ray Garrett v. Domingo Uribe
as 5:2009cv00984
Petitioner:
Clifford Ray Garrett
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ozel Clifford Brazil v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv02923
Petitioner:
Ozel Clifford Brazil
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clifford Dixon III v. Ken Clark
as 5:2009cv00755
Petitioner:
Clifford Dixon, III
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Clark
as 3:2009cv00682
Petitioner:
Clifford Dixon, III
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marc Anthony Lowell Endsley et al v. Jon DeMorales et al
as 2:2009cv01836
Plaintiff:
Marc Anthony Lowell Endsley, Daniel Trebas, Leonard Griffith and others
Defendant:
Jon DeMorales, Stephen Mayberg and Arnold Schwarenegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
