Cases 141 - 150 of 24,534
Miller v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Jafarris Deon Miller
Defendant:
Lee Harris, Tgichona Baldwin, Anthony Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cathey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Eric Cathey
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Audrey E. Downs
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillispie v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Jermuriel Gillispie
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jacob Shaffer
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair v. Louis et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Stephen Sinclair
Defendant:
Jeanssen Louis, Jason Porter, Ted Baltimore, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey v. Clarksville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Carl Kerry Von Erick Corey
Defendant:
Clarksville Police Dept., Hilton Garden Inn and Desi Hotel Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Carter et al
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Dearion Webb
Defendant:
CoreCivil/Medical, (f/n/u) Carter and (f/n/u) Jacobe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Nathaniel S Robinson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
